I want to know unbiased history of Ram Mandir and Babri masjid case of Ayodhya.
So I have lot of political debates with my family or friends usually. My parents are particularly passionate about this case and I just dont seem to understand the gravity of this case I want to learn and know facts about this and evrything that has happened from the beginning to form an honest opinion. Can somebody help me with websites/videos for this ?
History of Ayodhya RAM MANDIR - Know Many unknown facts
At 26 point 79° North and 82.19° East on the map of the world lies the temple town of Ayodhya. A place that it is believed to stretch back to a time beyond the realm of history. I heard her on the banks of the river Saraya is one of the holiest pilgrimage sites for wife neva Hindus who believe their God Ram was born here. Ayodhya Ram Mandir Till 1992 a Mosque stood at the exact same place where the followers of Ram believed he was born. Then on the 6th of December 1992 thousands of Hindu activists who had gathered the mosque 464 years after it was built. In 1528 when the first Mughal ruler Babar had already established this Christianity over the stand his generally in MIR BAQI built a Mosque. The mosque was situated on a mound and over the centuries a section of the Hindu community begin climbing that the Mughals built it by demoralizing a structure that marked Ram's. In 1853 the first records exist of a Hindu Muslim riot over the Masjid in Ayodhya. READ MORE:
133 reasons to oppose Narendra Modi and the NDA government.
By @aaacommie (previously stevia_potatohead) on Instagram | @stalynn07 on Twitter. Firstly, the Modi Government is an embarrassment on its own. https://m.thewire.in/article/external/narendra-modi-delhi-riots-global/amp?__twitter_impression=true Now let's get into the reasons why everyone should oppose this party of genocidal maniacs. Major trigger warning for many of these. (r@pe, mrder, sic*de, graphic content)
r/chodi demonizing Muslim children as murderers and calls for violence and genocide.
Context: On 10th February 2021, Rinku Sharma was stabbed to death by a Muslim mob. Rinku was a member of Bajrang Dal, a Hindu Nationalist Millitant group. His family has alleged that he was stabbed for collecting donations for the construction of The Ram Mandir, a Hindu temple in Ayodhya where Lord Ram is said to have taken birth. The Police have said that he was stabbed because of an argument. chodi, as is with every other far-right group on the planet, pushes forward the rhetoric that Hindus are in danger and everyone else is trying to destroy or harm them in some way. Christians, Muslims, Communists, and even liberal Hindus, basically everyone that they disagree with. They use tragedies like this as evidence for their claims and to spread their hate. Thread 1[+503] ImageNP link , Archive Translation: "Where are you going?" "To get a large dagger".
True af[+31] Yeh अटे कटे sab bhnklaode hai[+22]
Translation:These dick-cuts are all sisterfuck*rs "Dickcuts" is a reference to circumcision. They are even abusing children now and branding all Muslims as murderers.
Kids dude. Let's learn to convey the message in a better way[0]
We did not wish it but it was forced upon us. The consequences of this will be divinely devastating for them
Anyone wanna guess what "divinely devastating" is? Genocide? Violence? The image reads "In the inevitable war ahead, May Gods give us strength to be monsters that we had never wanted to be. No one would be spared. One be dead meat and other be treated as meat. Time devours everything." Again calling for genocide and violence.
They take our silence as submission. Time to hit back and hit so hard that they know never to mess with us. You are right brother, we didnt wish the violence, but if is forced on us, we should wipe the slate clean.[+19]
"Wiping the slate clean"
Plenty of Indian Muslims were celebrating the Murder. Nobody wants a genocide but you are a fool if you think we can co-exist peacefully
Sometimes I feel that only violence with them can teach them their place[+32] i will fucking rape allah with that same stick[+31] Exactly - Yogi once said "danav ko danav ki bhasha mein hi samjhana padta hai" - this is so true.[+30]
Translation: To make Monsters understand you have to talk to them in their own language. Calling Muslims monsters and calling for violence.
2002 2.0 ka time aa gaya hai phirse[+6]
Translation: Time for 2002 2.0 Referring to 2002 Gujarat Riots which ended with 1,044 people dead and 223 missing. Of the dead, 790 were Muslim and 254 Hindu.
Never forget ,never forgive, will destroy them wherever, whenever i can , till the end of my time
Thread 4[+370] Archive , NP Link Text reads: Rinku helped his murderer's wife, donated blood. But he forgot in the end he'll remain kaafir for them. Kaafir is Arabic for non-muslim.
Mera Abdul Alag hai vro
Translation: My Abdul is different vro. Abdul is a popular Muslim name which chodi uses as a slang term. Again implying that all Muslims are murderers.
Itihas me likha he ki ye koum apne baap ki nahi hui. To hamari kya hogi?[+46]
Translation: It's written in history that these people weren't loyal to their own fathers. How will they be loyal to us?
No matter how nice any M you know is in the end, they all are like this only. To them nothing is more important than their religion. If they have to remove you they will no matter how good of a friend you are.[+24]
M=Muslim
You may have M friends but remember, if its about religion, they won't give it a second thought. They will fight you because you are a kaffir, you must in turn fight them because they are hostile towards you (hence you enemies), there is no complex logic behind this. Pandavas too had to fight their own family to uphold Dharma. We only have to fight so called "friends".[+22] I don’t have any M friends. No one here should, either I used to think not all Muslims are bad but when 85-90% are bad, you can't jump the gun just for 10%. Wo 10 bhi last me gayab ho jayenge, jaisa hamesha hota hai.[+10]
Translation: Those 10 will also disappear, as always happens.
those 10% piecefools won't kill you but they wish that the rest 90% piecefools should do the job[+10]
chodi continues to call for genocide and violence, and continues to demonize Muslims. They have turned a tragedy like this to hate on all Muslims. They were also recently caught calling for genocide and dehumanising Muslims on their discord server after which it was banned. ( 1, 2) It's high time Reddit bans this cesspool of hate and bigotry.
From Anwesh Satpathy's blog- https://medium.com/@anweshsatpathy/dear-mr-pm-a-17-year-old-writes-to-the-prime-minister-98321731fe82 Dear Mr. Prime Minister, I came across your letter to citizens of India(30/5/20)recently on your website. As you rightfully point out, your electoral win was indeed historic. The people of India trust you. Along with many citizens of this country, I’m proud to live in a country which has the democratic institutions that make it possible for a “chaiwalla”(tea-seller) to become PM. However, my tone throughout this letter will be respectful but critical. Some would call this “the beauty of democracy”. The hon’ble Supreme Court has referred to dissent as the “safety valve of democracy”. Dissent is indeed a wonderful thing but I don’t think people should be obligated to the establishment for providing them with rights that they deserve. Even before your first term,a cult of personality was formed around you. This only strengthened with time. We were told , among other things, that you were “Vishnu’s avatar”, “God’s gift to the nation”, the world’s most beautiful face and a great economist. These were eminent members of your party. Many of them are Ministers. The fact that this rhetoric continued leads one to assume that you revel in sycophancy. In 2016,you announced your plan to clean Ganga. According to official sources, Ganga was supposed to be clean by July 2018. This was not merely an environmental issue, it was a symbolic statement as well. The river Ganges is a holy river for Hindus so one naturally assumes that it’d be your priority considering your adherence to Hindutva. 2018 came and went. Ganga did not become clean. A Hindu sannyasi and a former environmental engineering Professor G.D. Agrawal wrote a letter to your government complaining about the lack of action. The 86 year old Professor went on a fast unto death and elucidated his demands in a letter. The government failed to respond appropriately and the Sadhu died on 111th day of the fast from starvation. Along with many other conscientious citizens, I continue to believe that it was a murder. It would be futile to expect you to take any concrete action on environmental issues and climate change considering the fact that you believe “climate has not changed” only people have changed. We have also witnessed a slow capture of independent institutions. Many of your present day critics, such as the journalist Tavleen Singh, hoped that you’d dismantle influence of the elite Lutyen’s Delhi Durbar. You were seen as an outsider. One who won’t bow down to the influence of few courtiers. This elite circle was rightly referred to as exclusionary since it focused only on Delhi. This is not what has happened. We continue to passingly hear taunts at Lutyen’s Delhi. Indeed, you have mentioned it yourself. But there has been no systematic change at all. Lutyen’s Delhi continues to act as a propaganda tool for the establishment. The media now openly propagates polarization. It asks questions to the opposition, but rarely to the establishment. You have encouraged this attitude by giving interviews only to News outlets which praise you. They ask you about your poems, your childhood, your navratri fasts, your tireless energy, your selflessness, your “fakiri”, your apparently unscripted interviews abroad,your fashion sense, the medicines you take while ill, the movies you watch, the songs you listen to, how you eat mangoes and your sleep schedule. You have time to do an hour long interview with a Canadian Bollywood actor but you don’t have time to do a press conference. You don’t have time to do interviews with those who criticize you. You treat media outlets merely as a means to an end. A means to get your message, your propaganda across. Your regime is also slowly capturing the judiciary. Recently, the Gujurat High Court claimed that those who cannot “do anything good for the people have no right to criticize the functioning of the state government.” I consider this to be a rather petulant observation. The citizens of this country have every right to criticize and hold the government accountable. The government works for the people. Your government nominated former CJI Ranjan Gogoi as a Rajya Sabha MP just months after his retirement. This was seen by many as a clear Quid pro quo. Many of Justice Gogoi’s judgement continue to be mired in controversy. His dilution of free speech, his open defense of Assam NRC while the matter was still sub judice and his utter shamelessness in constituting a special bench to preside over a sexual harassment allegation against himself. One cannot help but wonder whether the nomination was a “reward” to him for delivering verdicts that worked in favor of your regime. Your late friend Mr. Arun Jaitley was spot on when he said “Pre-retirement judgements are influenced by post-retirement jobs.” In your letter, you mentioned the Ram Mandir judgement of the Supreme Court along with achievements of your government. One wonders why you didn’t feel the need to write a letter(or even a tweet) hailing the Supreme Court’s equally historic judgement on Sec 377 and the Sabarimala issue. In fact, you seem to have actively opposed the Sabarimala judgement while remaining ambivalent about LGBTQ issues. Your government’s neutral approach to Section 377 was excoriated by Justice DY Chandrachud himself. Justice Chandrachud rightfully points out that this section treated LGBTQ individuals on par with rapists and child molesters. Thus, the government’s neutral stance does nothing to prevent the “stigmatization” of the LGBTQ+ community. Could this be due to the fact that the Ayodhya judgement was politically expedient for you? While you were holding a highly publicized event with President Trump in February, Delhi was burning. President Trump praised you for “working very hard on religious freedom” while citizens were being slaughtered for belonging to a different religion. The police openly took sides and chanted “Jai Shree Ram” while charging at Muslim protesters. For your critics, this wasn’t surprising. The country witnessed the same lack of law and order bordering on state complicity during the Gujarat riots . One can attribute this to incompetence but the fact that there’s a pattern makes me wonder whether its sheer calculated malevolence. The lack of proper planning of lockdown has added to the unnecessary misery of migrants and day laborers. We have come across harrowing visuals of injured migrants who were forced to travel with dead bodies in the back of a truck, migrants dying of starvation and most recently the video clip of a baby trying to wake up of its mother who died of starvation. The fact that this has continued for almost a month now speaks volumes about the ineptness of the establishment. You talk about the pluralism of the nation while considering MS Golwalkar to be “Pujniya”(worthy of worship). In his book, We or Our Nationhood defined, Golwalkar writes “The foreign races in Hindustan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, must entertain no ideas but those of glorification of the Hindu race and culture or may stay in the country wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment not even citizens rights.’’ You claim that the Constitution is your holy book while idolizing Deen Dayal Upadhyaya, who condemned the constitution and the use of the word “secular”(along with Golwalkar). You claim to stand for the ideals of Gandhi but take no action against Sadhvi Pragya for referring to his murderer as a “patriot”. You claim to believe that “the entire world is one family” while choosing the communal Yogi Adityanath as CM of UP. Mr. Adityanath has openly instigated violence and claimed that Hindus and Muslims cannot co-exist. Your followers claim that opposition to you is opposition to the country. They have created an “us Vs. Them” narrative. The fact remains that you are not the country. The BJP doesn’t have a monopoly on nationalism, despite what the media would want us to believe. India is a democracy and you have only been elected to serve the people. You are accountable to the people. The people have elected you and they have every right to criticize you if they’re dissatisfied. Some would blame me for criticizing you for what MPs and Ministers of your party say. Surely, you’re not responsible. However, your silence has fostered this polarization. The buck stops with you. Your ambivalence, your silence and your neutrality is a statement in itself. Mr. Prime Minister, speak up. Never before has silence screamed so loud. Speak up lest you go down in history as the real “Silent Prime Minister.” Yours respectfully, Anwesh
Thoughts on the current state of Hindu-Sikh "unity" and bitter realities Hindus should know
After receiving several messages saying I am a Pakistani agent by one very old user who seems to be a Hindu, I thought I would make a post bringing to light some realities about Hindu-Sikh relations. I harbor no hatred toward the Sikh community nor do I believe they are all traitors. However, the Khalistan movement and Sikh nationalism is more deeply entrenched than some people here would like to believe. I don't believe the guy who sent me those "Paki" messages has bad intentions. I just think he's fallen into the delusion of an imagined "dharmic unity" against the "peacefuls," which to be frank, sounds like a modified form of the same pseudo-secularism, just with a different minority. Many of these are Hindus who have not lived in/around Punjab. Sikhs should have ideally have become a kind of warrior Panth within the Hindu fold. We have a shared history of a united struggle against Islamic invaders. Sikh Gurus and later the kukas fought for protection of the cow and Kashmiri Pandits lived peacefully under the rule of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Many Sikhs went to temples, Hindus to gurudwaras, there was intermarriage - in essence, a syncretic Hindu-Sikh culture prevailed in Punjab, and it does to a large extent even today. However, there was also a group of Sikhs who considered themselves separate from Hindus and had a more Abrahamic interpretation of their texts. During British rule, especially in the late 1800s, missionary activity was strong. To counter it, sects like Arya Samaj (Hindus), Singh Sabha (Sikhs) and Aligarh movement (Muslims) rose as a counter. Arya Samaj, though monotheistic in practice, found many followers in Punjab. Bhagat Singh's family for example was of Arya Samaji/Sikh background. However, this caused issues with Sikhs whose Gurus Dayanand Saraswati considered foolish and hypocritical. Many Sikhs became Hindus this way, cutting off their kesh. The British took advantage of this and propped up the Abrahamicised sect Tat Khalsa (based in Lahore) to take control of the Akal Takht in Amritsar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tat_Khalsa These are the people who say they are not Hindus and would later agitate for Khalistan. They control the Gurudwaras. Earlier, the Akal Takht used to have murtis of Hindu Gods, which would be removed roughly a decade after Tat Khalsa Singh Sabha usurped it. Earlier, Akal Takht was controlled by the Sanatan Singh Sabha, which, true to its name, considered itself one with Hindus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanatan_Singh_Sabha https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanatan_Sikh Sanatan Sikhs, unlike Tat Khalsa Sikhs (who are the majority), descended directly from the Gurus. Either way, they are a small minority now and during the Khalistan movement, Bhindranwale hunted them down with more barbarity than he did Hindus. Among the groups persecuted by the Tat Khalsa, were Namdhari Sikhs, who to this day, consider themselves Hindu as well as Sikh. The Sikhs depicted in this post are Namdharis and can be recognised by the white turban. Namdharis, Nirankari Sikhs and Udasis are today not recognised as true Sikhs by the SPGC (the governing body of Sikhs in India). The SPGC is ruled by Akali Dal (which is an alliance partner of the BJP). They are nothing but a crypto-Khalistani party who worship Bhindranwale and whitewash his crimes. I have written in detail about Bhindranwale. Many Sikhs who you would think are nationalists support Bhindranwale. These are your average army personnel, policemen, bureaucrats. Doesn't mean you should hate them, but know this. Akal Takht supporting Muslims in their opposition to CAA/NRC (Indian Sikhs btw) Khalsa Aid under investigation by NIA BJP-Akali Dal issues over Bhindranwale memorial Akal Takht wants to ban RSS RSS reconverting Christians to Sikhism is not accepted by Akal Takht Bihari students fight with Sikhs over Bhindranwale poster blackening Akal Takht rejecting invitation to Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan Majinder Sirsa defending Bhindranwale "All Sikhs want Khalistan" -- Akal Takht head Akal Takht/Akali Dal/Tat Khalsa don’t want Hindu-Sikh unity. They wanted complete control of Punjab and domination. They would have turned Punjab into another Kashmir. No amount of “Paki Paki” insults will change this fact.
Our Lord Ram is a significant figure in the realm of Hinduism. Lord Ram is an ancestor to all of us whether we are Hindus or not. The significance of Ayodhya being the birthplace of Lord Ram is not something to be taken lightly. Centuries ago, a Mandir was actually present in Ayodhya but was razed down in place of the Babri Masjid. Imagine having someplace as holy as Mecca or the Western Wall being razed down to build a Church. Imagine the bloodbath that would ensue! When we greet someone, we always say "Ram Ram" to everyone because Lord Ram is present in all of us. There are cities in Southeast Asia named after Ayodhya due to it's significance throughout history. Such an influential figure in Hinduism was taken for granted in Ayodhya in the name of secularism. The saying goes Mandir Wahi Baneyga aur Mandir Wahi Banayenge (Mandir is going to be built and the Mandir will be built here) is a monoumental moment in the history of not only India but for Hinduism and around the world. In spite of everything, it is a great time that our Lord Ram is going to be honored once again. We always say Jai Shree Ram because Lord Ram is always omnipresent. All I can say is with people in India while being outside India in the United States is Jai Shree Ram!
Is there truth in this WhatsApp forward - supposed to give Chronology of The original temple demolition to today. If anyone can provide credible sources, it would be great. Thanks in Advance.
“Alexander Cunningham, in the Lucknow Gazetteer speaks about the carnage that Mir Banki, a governor under Babur, unleashed on Ayodhya. Over 1.74 lakh Hindus who had gathered to protect the Shriram temple site were ruthlessly slaughtered; their bodies piled high and wide. Mir Banki’s canons fired into the temple and reduced it to rubble. Hamilton writes in the Barabanki Gazetteer ‘Jalalshah used stones from Lahore coloured with the blood of Hindus in the construction of the mosque. Kajal Abbas Musa Ashikan Kalandarsahib a zealous Muslim fakir was the ‘inspiration’ for the destruction of the temple and the construction of a grand mosque in its place. He had plans to turn Ayodhya into a Mecca of the east. In his memoirs, Babur recounts the destruction of the Ram Mandir (in Ayodhya) on the orders of Abbas Musa Ashikan Kalandar and how the materials from the temple were reused to build a mosque in its place. The wanton death and destruction in Ayodhya did not deter the Hindus from their fight to reclaim Ram Janmabhoomi, it continued even into Humayun’s (Babur’s heir) reign. 10,000 suryavamshi Kshatriya warriors of Sirsinda and Rajepur near Ayodhya, geared up to fight for Ram Janmabhoomi. They destroyed all Mughal structures surrounding the tempe area. They even managed to destroy the entrance to the Babri masjid. Three days after this started, the Mughal army engaged the kshatriya warriors and killed them. The Mughal army also had their revenge by destroying and burning down the villages from which the warriors hailed. After the massacre during Humayun’s rule, it took some years before the Hindus could regroup and try to reclaim the Ram Janmabhoomi. Under Akbar’s (Humayun’s heir) rule another battle for Ayodhya ensued. This time however, the Mughals were not taken by surprise and the Hindus faced a strong resistance. The Hindu warriors persevered and managed to erect a platform to build a temple on, right in front of the mosque. . Raja Birbal and Raja Todarmal prevailed on Akbar to allow the platform to stand. Akbar then consented to a small temple housing a Shriram murti (idol) on the same platform. The ain-i-akbari (the chronicles of Akbar’s reign) documents this in the following words.. ‘The Hindus tried 20 times to reclaim Ram Janmabhoomi. On the insistence of Raja Birbal and Raja Todarmal, Jalal-ud-din Akbar ordered that the construction of a platform be allowed in front of the Babri masjid and that a small Ram temple can be built on top of it. It was furthered proclaimed that no harm should come to the Hindu worship in the temple.’ This order was followed by Akbar’sson Nuruddin Jahangir and grandson Shahbuddin Shahjahan, who allowed the daily worship to take occur sans interference. having wrested the throne from Shahjahan, Aurangzeb turned his attention to Ayodhya. He sent his general Jabaz Khan on a campaign to Ayodhya. The Hindus of Ayodhya got wind of the impending attack and ferried the idol of Shriram and all the temple articles to safety. The surrounding villages, which had been warned of the attack, gathered a formidable Hindu force to protect the temple. Vaishnavdas (a disciple of Samarth Ramdas Swami) used to live in the Parashuram monastery on the Ahalya ghat in Ayodhya. He had the support of 10,000 tong-wielding sadhus. When they learned of the attack by Jabaz Khan’s attack on Ram Janmabhoomi, they rushed to join and fight alongside the Hindus. For seven days the Hindus and the Mughal forces clashed at Urvashikund. At the end of a fierce battle the Mughal forces took their heels. Four years of peace had lulled the Hindus of Ayodhya into a false sense of security. In 1664 Aurangzeb attacked Ayodhya again and slaughtered 10000 Hindus. Their bodies were dumped into a well (भागात स्थित असलेल्या नवकोणातील कर्न्दप विहीरी) to the west of the temple and walled in. The well has stood the sands of time to tell the story of the cruelty of Aurangzeb and the Mughals. Today the Muslims claim ownership of the well too. It was after this war that the royal army destroyed the platform on which the Ram Mandir was built and fortified the area (याच युद्धानंतर शाही सेनेने रामजन्मभूमीचा कट्टा खोदून त्याला गडाचे रूप दिले.). Now each year, on Ramanavami, the Hindus offer flowers and other offerings to this destroyed platform. After Aurangzeb, Lukhnow came under the rule of the Nawabs. The Hindus tried to reclaim Ram Janmabhoomi by force during the rule of Nawab Sahadat Ali. Unfortunately they failed. B. The Hindus tried again to wrest control of Ram Janmabhoomi during the rule of Nawab Nasiruddin Haider. Many Hindu kings joined forces and the battle raged for 8 long days. The Nawab’s army reached Hanumangadh. There, the Hindu forces received help from the tong-wielding sadhus. Together they managed to make the nawab’s army flee and took control of Ram Janmabhoomi. This victory was short-lived though, the Nawab’s forces recaptured Ram Janmabhoomi in few days. Hindu efforts to regain Ayodhya continued into the reign of Nawab Wajid Ali Shah. Almost every Hindu king of Awadh, barring a couple, participated in this struggle. Cunningham’s brief account regarding this was published in a book from the Faizabad Literary collection. He says that the Nawab’s (mostly English) army stood by watching the Hindus and the Muslims fight amongst themselves to control Ayodhya. The battle raged for two days. Houses, crypts and mosques were destroyed, even livestock was not spared. Blinded by rage as they may have been, the Hindus did not cross certain lines; they did not attack or molest the Muslim women and children. The Muslims began to flee Ayodhya. Worried that the situation may go out of control, the Nawab’s army imposed travel restrictions in Ayodhya. Maharaja Mansingh conferred with the Nawab and directed the Hindus to rebuild a platform in Ayodhya and install the idol of Shriram there. A makeshift temple was also erected. A. Even while the country was under British rule, the hindus did not forgo their desire to see a Temple in Ram Janmabhoomi. Attempts to make over the temple land in 1912 were thwarted by the Biritish though. B. In 1934, the Hindus were able to overcome the British forces in Ayodhya and they managed to inflict significant damage to the Masjid. However, a British officer (उपायुक्) J P Nicholson, had the damage rectified and the masjid rebuilt. A small plaque in a part of the masjid reads ‘Tahawwar Khan rebuilt the mosque destroyed by the Hindus on 27.3.1934 (1352 Hijri)’. 6 December, 1992, is a date that many people are familiar with. But few people know that prior to this day, there have been 77 attempts to regain control of Ram Janmabhoomi. With 4 attempts during the time of Babur, 10 during Humayun’s rule, 30 when Aurangzeb was on the throne, 5 when Shahadat Ali was the ruler, 3 during the time of Nasir-ud-din Haider, 2 during British rule and once post independence, during the tenure of Shri P V Narasimha Rao; the struggle for Ram Janmabhoomi has been a long and arduous journey. A sense of fulfilment can only be achieved when we stop idolising invaders and try and rebuild our forgotten heritage. Rajdharma (the code of conduct for a ruler) dictates that it is the duty of the King to look after the welfare of the subjects and provide relief when they are distressed. So if a thief targets the citizens, it is the ruler’s duty to have the thief apprehended and punished. Only with stringent and appropriate punishment can justice be delivered and order restored. This historic judgement also reminds us of the nasty roles played by a group of shameless faceless 'historians' like R S Sharma, Vipan Chandra, Romila Thapar, Irfan Habib et al who distorted our history. But their efforts to influence the ASI failed. ASI is the real hero for bringing out the truth by the grace of Bhagaban Sri Ramachandra. The post will not be complete without a BIG thank you to PM Modi and his government and party. “Modi hai to mumkin hai” proved once more for the umpteenth time this year... Jai Shri Ram.... 🙏
Maulana Modi - How to focus on long term goals , rather than short term gloat?
After Palghar incident many people has raised a basic questions - "Why Modi and Shah are not tweeting about it?" or we can phrase it as - "What Modi has done to protect India and it's Indic Culture?" Modi after becoming PM never commented on hate crimes - there is a basic reason behind it - if he talks about it - the story get more highlight - which allows the LEFT NEXUS to project false and maligned image of India. It also helps in there false narrative of - "Intolerance is rising!" Never forget even after getting clean cheat from all the intelligence services (which were controlled by Congress) - the left media never missed a chance - where they haven't asked him - "Don't you think you should say sorry for what you did ?" Modi has seen the Left and it's machinery like no one else. After 2002 he know very well how they work to end political careers. We need to focus on long term goals - we need to plan for a whole decade - small changes slowly over a long period of time never attract too much attention nor criticism.Thus not giving substance to stupid protests by commies. Over the years Congress and Left(communist) has formed many international ties and machinery - A WHOLE FUCKING NEXUS - from media houses ,to university students, to lobbies all around the world. When your enemy is powerful in certain areas- you don't strike it where he is strong - you slowly attack on the corners - till he is on his knees. He is slowly attacking the root cause of all the problem - the nexus - the sycophancy to nehru- gandhi dynasty. He proved to the world that RG is an incompetent leader - people laugh on him after his loss in amethi. Modi and his team almost boycotted the LEFT cucks like NDTV, ThePrint etc. (still they will apear sometimes - just to make them feel the importance) - they are slowly dying. What has Modi achieved so far :
Removal of Article 370 :
Long term effect : -Reduced/destroyed chances of insurgency. -Slow death of pakistan based lobbies - halted funding. -There was a mission to change demographics of Jammu by giving citizenship (land grabs as well) to muslims refugees. It has lost most of it's support. -Formation of new Pro-India parties in J&K - remember the panchayat election was fought mostly by new independent leaders. -More efficient surveillance and espionage in POK. -Indian Flag - new sense of values and symbols which will represent J&K .
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act :
-This was a masterstroke that many people has just forgotten. This is a knife on the throats of anti india people hiding as communist or working under foreign funded NGO's - such as fraud tribal activists. -This bill enhances NIA's power - always remember the most important element to catch such individuals is the element of SURPRISE - bill seeks to empower NIA to conduct raids anywhere without the relevant state government's prior permission.(permission lenge to sasura bhaag ni jayega!) -Most important - radical groups of islamist - always fooled the system with different names and identities - no more - The amendments seek to allow the government to designate an individual as terrorist and bring in embargo on arms/assets seizures. -Recently Umar Khalid got arrested - just another example of how - sends shivers down the throat of anti india people.
Citizenship Amendment Act :
-An act to protect the persecuted religious minorities from neighboring Islamic republics. -This act is not just a shelter for persecuted religious communities - but also a message to pakistan , afganistan and bangladesh - that we care for our people - and India will form policies to protect them if they don't.
Ram Mandir In Ayodhya :
- this was a fight of over a century - finally truth prevailed - hindus has right to worship on the place they consider the Vishnu Avatar - ram was born. This will affect minds of many generations - when they will visit the temple in Ayodhya - the myth that the communist/liberals has created - ram was a fictional character - get vanished . The history shines in the form of a majestic temple - a curiosity in the mind of young ones - to understand ram - to be proud of him!
Renaming "Allahbad" as "Prayagraj"
- Kumbh is biggest human gathering of greatest of devotees - the protectors of sanatan sankriti - was celebrated in a city which was named after ''allah". Just imagine what image this creates in mind of a child - when he read about the past and realize - "Oh! there is no place as prayagraj - may be all this scripture are just another fiction". We restored it to the name that our great sages proposed in the many scriptures.
Sanskrit Universities :
- A way to form a group of masters of sanatan sankriti - this will lead to : -better translations of our scriptures and history. -new works of literature in sanskrit. -a sense of unity among - north and south with shared history of common languages . -scholars to represent india on international platforms - before destroying the hub's of communist controlled institutes - we need to create more options for future generation. A lot has been done - a lot has to be done. So be calm - keep your senses in control - don't do - what enemy want's you to do.Never be reactive.
History of Hindus Struggle for the Sri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple “Alexander Cunningham, in the Lucknow Gazetteer speaks about the carnage that Mir Banki, a governor under Babur, unleashed on Ayodhya. Over 1.74 lakh Hindus who had gathered to protect the Shriram temple site were ruthlessly slaughtered; their bodies piled high and wide. Mir Banki’s canons fired into the temple and reduced it to rubble. Hamilton writes in the Barabanki Gazetteer ‘Jalalshah used stones from Lahore coloured with the blood of Hindus in the construction of the mosque. Kajal Abbas Musa Ashikan Kalandarsahib a zealous Muslim fakir was the ‘inspiration’ for the destruction of the temple and the construction of a grand mosque in its place. He had plans to turn Ayodhya into a Mecca of the east. In his memoirs, Babur recounts the destruction of the Ram Mandir (in Ayodhya) on the orders of Abbas Musa Ashikan Kalandar and how the materials from the temple were reused to build a mosque in its place. The wanton death and destruction in Ayodhya did not deter the Hindus from their fight to reclaim Ram Janmabhoomi, it continued even into Humayun’s (Babur’s heir) reign. 10,000 suryavamshi Kshatriya warriors of Sirsinda and Rajepur near Ayodhya, geared up to fight for Ram Janmabhoomi. They destroyed all Mughal structures surrounding the tempe area. They even managed to destroy the entrance to the Babri masjid. Three days after this started, the Mughal army engaged the kshatriya warriors and killed them. The Mughal army also had their revenge by destroying and burning down the villages from which the warriors hailed. After the massacre during Humayun’s rule, it took some years before the Hindus could regroup and try to reclaim the Ram Janmabhoomi. Under Akbar’s (Humayun’s heir) rule another battle for Ayodhya ensued. This time however, the Mughals were not taken by surprise and the Hindus faced a strong resistance. The Hindu warriors persevered and managed to erect a platform to build a temple on, right in front of the mosque. . Raja Birbal and Raja Todarmal prevailed on Akbar to allow the platform to stand. Akbar then consented to a small temple housing a Shriram murti (idol) on the same platform. The ain-i-akbari (the chronicles of Akbar’s reign) documents this in the following words.. ‘The Hindus tried 20 times to reclaim Ram Janmabhoomi. On the insistence of Raja Birbal and Raja Todarmal, Jalal-ud-din Akbar ordered that the construction of a platform be allowed in front of the Babri masjid and that a small Ram temple can be built on top of it. It was furthered proclaimed that no harm should come to the Hindu worship in the temple.’ This order was followed by Akbar’sson Nuruddin Jahangir and grandson Shahbuddin Shahjahan, who allowed the daily worship to take occur sans interference. having wrested the throne from Shahjahan, Aurangzeb turned his attention to Ayodhya. He sent his general Jabaz Khan on a campaign to Ayodhya. The Hindus of Ayodhya got wind of the impending attack and ferried the idol of Shriram and all the temple articles to safety. The surrounding villages, which had been warned of the attack, gathered a formidable Hindu force to protect the temple. Vaishnavdas (a disciple of Samarth Ramdas Swami) used to live in the Parashuram monastery on the Ahalya ghat in Ayodhya. He had the support of 10,000 tong-wielding sadhus. When they learned of the attack by Jabaz Khan’s attack on Ram Janmabhoomi, they rushed to join and fight alongside the Hindus. For seven days the Hindus and the Mughal forces clashed at Urvashikund. At the end of a fierce battle the Mughal forces took their heels. Four years of peace had lulled the Hindus of Ayodhya into a false sense of security. In 1664 Aurangzeb attacked Ayodhya again and slaughtered 10000 Hindus. Their bodies were dumped into a well (भागात स्थित असलेल्या नवकोणातील कर्न्दप विहीरी) to the west of the temple and walled in. The well has stood the sands of time to tell the story of the cruelty of Aurangzeb and the Mughals. Today the Muslims claim ownership of the well too. It was after this war that the royal army destroyed the platform on which the Ram Mandir was built and fortified the area (याच युद्धानंतर शाही सेनेने रामजन्मभूमीचा कट्टा खोदून त्याला गडाचे रूप दिले.). Now each year, on Ramanavami, the Hindus offer flowers and other offerings to this destroyed platform. After Aurangzeb, Lukhnow came under the rule of the Nawabs. The Hindus tried to reclaim Ram Janmabhoomi by force during the rule of Nawab Sahadat Ali. Unfortunately they failed. B. The Hindus tried again to wrest control of Ram Janmabhoomi during the rule of Nawab Nasiruddin Haider. Many Hindu kings joined forces and the battle raged for 8 long days. The Nawab’s army reached Hanumangadh. There, the Hindu forces received help from the tong-wielding sadhus. Together they managed to make the nawab’s army flee and took control of Ram Janmabhoomi. This victory was short-lived though, the Nawab’s forces recaptured Ram Janmabhoomi in few days. Hindu efforts to regain Ayodhya continued into the reign of Nawab Wajid Ali Shah. Almost every Hindu king of Awadh, barring a couple, participated in this struggle. Cunningham’s brief account regarding this was published in a book from the Faizabad Literary collection. He says that the Nawab’s (mostly English) army stood by watching the Hindus and the Muslims fight amongst themselves to control Ayodhya. The battle raged for two days. Houses, crypts and mosques were destroyed, even livestock was not spared. Blinded by rage as they may have been, the Hindus did not cross certain lines; they did not attack or molest the Muslim women and children. The Muslims began to flee Ayodhya. Worried that the situation may go out of control, the Nawab’s army imposed travel restrictions in Ayodhya. Maharaja Mansingh conferred with the Nawab and directed the Hindus to rebuild a platform in Ayodhya and install the idol of Shriram there. A makeshift temple was also erected. A. Even while the country was under British rule, the hindus did not forgo their desire to see a Temple in Ram Janmabhoomi. Attempts to make over the temple land in 1912 were thwarted by the Biritish though. B. In 1934, the Hindus were able to overcome the British forces in Ayodhya and they managed to inflict significant damage to the Masjid. However, a British officer (उपायुक्) J P Nicholson, had the damage rectified and the masjid rebuilt. A small plaque in a part of the masjid reads ‘Tahawwar Khan rebuilt the mosque destroyed by the Hindus on 27.3.1934 (1352 Hijri)’. 6 December, 1992, is a date that many people are familiar with. But few people know that prior to this day, there have been 77 attempts to regain control of Ram Janmabhoomi. With 4 attempts during the time of Babur, 10 during Humayun’s rule, 30 when Aurangzeb was on the throne, 5 when Shahadat Ali was the ruler, 3 during the time of Nasir-ud-din Haider, 2 during British rule and once post independence, during the tenure of Shri P V Narasimha Rao; the struggle for Ram Janmabhoomi has been a long and arduous journey. A sense of fulfilment can only be achieved when we stop idolising invaders and try and rebuild our forgotten heritage. Rajdharma (the code of conduct for a ruler) dictates that it is the duty of the King to look after the welfare of the subjects and provide relief when they are distressed. So if a thief targets the citizens, it is the ruler’s duty to have the thief apprehended and punished. Only with stringent and appropriate punishment can justice be delivered and order restored. This historic judgement also reminds us of the nasty roles played by a group of shameless faceless 'historians' like R S Sharma, Vipan Chandra, Romila Thapar, Irfan Habib et al who distorted our history. But their efforts to influence the ASI failed. ASI is the real hero for bringing out the truth by the grace of Bhagaban Sri Ramachandra. The post will not be complete without a BIG thank you to PM Modi and his government and party. “Modi hai to mumkin hai” proved once more for the umpteenth time this year... ಜೈ ಶ್ರೀ ರಾಮ್
Are the students of Jamia Millia Islamia really interested in secularism? Evidence points to the contrary.
Over the past week or so, we have seen violent protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) across many states. The one that was probably reported the most was the protest by Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) students. News channels like NDTV and India Today repeatedly reported how the police used excessive force against “peaceful” protesters. We were told that the students were opposed to the omission of Muslims from the CAA and sought to fight against it to “save” Indian democracy and “secularism”. While going through posts on social media, I came across an interesting piece of information - that JMI reserved 50% of its seats for Muslims. Not having too much faith in the accuracy of social media posts, I wanted to verify if this was really the case. Because if it were, it would clearly show that JMI was anything but secular. And so I started to go through their official websites: www.jmi.ac.in and www.jmicoe.in. What I learnt during my research astounded me. I knew that Muslim institutions gave preferential treatment to Muslims over non-Muslims but I never expected it to be this bad. My article relies solely on the documents and information available on these two official websites. No third parties, no hearsay. All the sources and links are listed at the end of this article. To begin with, the claim that 50% seats in JMI are reserved for Muslims is absolutely true. The following text has been taken from Page 30 of the 2018-19 prospectus of JMI. (as can be seen in the attached image) 5.1 (i) 30% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for Muslim applicants. (ii) 10% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for Women applicants who are Muslims. (iii) 10% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for “Other Backward Classes” (OBCs) and Scheduled Tribes who are Muslims. Note: If seats remain vacant in any program from amongst the 10% of the total number of seats earmarked as per 5.1 (ii) and (iii) above, such vacant seats shall stand transferred to the category 5.1(i),i.e., Muslim applicants. In other words, 30% seats for Muslim applicants + 10% for Muslim women + 10% for Muslim OBC. If there are any vacant seats from the Muslim women or Muslim OBC category, then those seats would be transferred to other Muslim applicants. So there would AT LEAST 50% seats for Muslims in JMI. Why do I say at least 50%? Well, apart from the 50% reservation for Muslims, there’s 5% reservation for Persons with Disabilities (or PwD). This reservation for PwDs is not limited Muslims only but since the selection of students would be done by the JMI staff, they could opt for Muslims over PwDs from other religions. And on top of that, there’s 5% reservation for “Internal (Jamia) students” i.e. students of Jamia who have passed their qualifying examination (X or XII) from Jamia Schools. And given that the same 50% reservation policy for Muslims exists in Jamia schools, the students from this category could all be Muslims. So on the whole, there could be up to a maximum of 60% Muslims from the reserved categories. But wait, it gets a lot worse!! There could be far more than 60% Muslims in a program / course. How? Because Muslims can also get admissions in the General category !!! In other words, 50% seats are reserved for Muslims only i.e. only Muslims can opt for these seats. Of the 5% reserved seats for PwDs, Muslims can be given preference. And 5% reservation for internal jamia students would almost certainly be all Muslims. On top of that, there would be Muslim applicants in the General category i.e. Muslims students who opt for admissions not via reservation but in the general category. So in the end, the percentage of Muslim students could be way more than 60%. To find out the exact proportion of Muslim students, one would require the list of all admissions in a particular program / course. I did find the list of all admissions for the year 2019-20 but since those lists display only the registration number of the students and not their name and religion, it cannot be used to determine the exact number of Muslim students. However I did find the list of graduated students for the year 2018. This list mentions the name of the candidates in addition to the registration number. Here’s what I found: a. In B.Tech Computer Engineering, 37 of the 62 graduates are Muslims i.e. 59%. b. In B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering, 40 of the 62 graduates are Muslims i.e. 64%. c. In B.Tech Mechanical Engineering, 43 of the 65 graduates are Muslims i.e. 66%. d. In B.Tech Civil Engineering, 51 of the 65 graduates are Muslims i.e. 78%. Assuming that the proportion of students in admission and graduation would be more-or-less the same, this data not only confirmed my suspicions that the percentage of Muslim students in various courses would be least 60% but went on to show that it may be as high as 80%. I analysed the data for these four streams of engineering. There are several other courses but I did not spend my time analysing each and every single one. For those who are interested to dig deeper, relevant links can be found at the end of this article. I then looked into scholarships i.e. what percentage of the total number of students who received scholarships were Muslims. Alumni Association of Jamia Millia Islamia (AAJMI) is tasked with providing scholarships for JMI students. I found the list of the selected candidates for the current year. In the first list, out of the 325 selected candidates, 303 are Muslims; which is 93% !! And in the second list, 96 out of the 99 candidates are Muslims i.e. 97%. In other words, of all the students who received scholarship in 2019, approximately 95% were Muslims. This data conclusively proves that an overwhelming majority of students at JMI are Muslims and that Muslims are given preferential treatment. I wondered if the same pattern holds true for the positions of deans and Heads of Department (HODs). And predictably enough, JMI does not disappoint !! Of the 37 heads of various departments, 32 are Muslim i.e. 86%. And when it comes to the Deans of faculties, 8 of the 9 are Muslim = 89% !! (Annual Report 2017-18) Finally, I went through the list of Chancellors and Vice-Chancellors of JMI. By now, I’m sure you can guess what I would have found. Of the 11 Chancellors since 1920, not one is a non-Muslim. And the same holds true for VCs. Not one of the 15 Vice Chancellors since 1920 is a non-Muslim. So in the end, 60-80% of the students, 95% of scholarship recipients, 86% of the HODs, approximately 90% of the Deans of faculties, and all the past & present Chancellors & Vice Chancellors of JMI are Muslims !! And yet, they claim to fight for "secularism" !!! Ask yourself these simple questions: 1. How serious can the students of such a university be about “secularism”? 2. Should we as a nation pay any heed to their demands given their shameless hypocrisy? 3. If they indeed were such strong believers in the idea of secularism then wouldn’t they start by secularising their own university first? 4. Do the students and professors of this university have a moral right to oppose ANY act on the grounds of secularism? For any unbiased reader, this article conclusively proves that the JMI is not interested in secularism in the least. Then why are they protesting CAA? In my opinion, the reasons are: 1. Supreme Court’s decision in favour of Ram Mandir at Ayodhya. 2. Belief that Muslims must be loyal to fellow Muslims over the country i.e. Muslim Ummah (or Ummat). 3. Rightly / wrongly concluding that NRC will be bad. It is also very interesting how leftists / liberals and Muslims have learnt the subtle art of appropriating the Constitution to suit their own agenda. Everybody has heard the accusation that the CAA violates Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. One can find many Muslims, and non-Muslims, repeating the same crap. It is however very interesting that Muslims are demanding equality and cite Article 14 as the justification. Well, if they are so bent upon equality, then why don’t they accept the demand for Universal Civil Code (UCC)? NO!! You see, when the debate is about UCC, they quote Article 25 of the Constitution which gives the right to practice one’s own religion and claim various special privileges as a religious right; for eg. four wives, triple talaq, etc. And when the discussion pertains to giving citizenship to non-Muslim minorities from neighbouring Islamic countries, they jump to Article 14 !! In other words, they pick and choose that which suits them. So the next time you meet a leftist/liberal or Muslim who says that they oppose CAA because it goes against Article 14 and the principle of equal treatment, ask him if he supports Universal Civil Code. If he denies or gives you a lengthy nonsensical answer as to why he opposes UCC, then he stands exposed ; proving that he / she is not really interested in secularism. It is amazing that channels like NDTV who claim to present facts as they are have never seen fit to inform Indians about the vastly disproportionate number of Muslim students in JMI. Nor do they call out the hypocrisy of JMI “students”. If they would have, the whole country would have learnt that these protests have nothing to do with “secularism”. Now it is up to us to spread the word. Please share / forward this article so that the truth about JMI is known to everyone. (Original post by Rahul Arya, Right to Recall Party) Links: 1. JMI Prospectus for the year 2018-19 (see page 30): https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/admission/prospectus2018.pdf 2. JMI Prospectus for the year 2019-20 (see page 29): http://jmicoe.in/pdf18/Prospectus\_2019-20-new.pdf 3. JMI schools prospectus for 2019-20 (see page 9): http://jmicoe.in.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf19/Final%20Prospectus%20JSSS-2019-20%20\_1\_.pdf 4. Annual convocation 2018: https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/EventDetail/annualconvocation2019\_fet\_list\_2018.pdf 5. AAJMI scholarship: https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/advertisement/notice\_aajmi\_scholarship\_int\_2019february12.pdfhttps://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/advertisement/scholarship\_aajmi\_fl2\_2019april17.pdf 6. JMI Annual Report 2017-18 (pages 13-15): https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/menuupload/university\_annual\_report\_english\_2017\_2018.pdf 7. List of Chancellors: https://www.jmi.ac.in/aboutjamia/profile/history/past\_chancellors\_profile-15 8. Lisf of Vice Chancellors: https://www.jmi.ac.in/aboutjamia/profile/history/past\_vice\_chancellors\_profile-16
Bhaion, Yesterday I believe I made a comment on progress of Hindu society since Independence. I think it's good. I want you to give it some love
You have no idea how much country has progressed. When Ayodhya verdict came, Sangh said it publicly, a Dalit will be the main pujari of the upcoming temple at Ayodhya. And you can't show me one significant squeak from any of the Hindus. Everyone applauded the statement and most probably it will be done that way. Hindus all over the country have changed. No bloodshed no revolutions, nothing of that sort. Hindus by and large recognize the disadvantaged, there is not a question on that. They've accepted affirmative action by and large without significant social upheavals. You'll need to look up world histories elsewhere what it took to have this kind of a change. This is one state down South (Andhra Pradesh), who have elected a Christian as their chief minister, that too with a crushing victory. I am proud of all these, and many more changes in our society that is happening relatively peacefully and gradually. I know you lefties want results right now or yesterday. Well, go ahead and launch a revolution and fill the streets with bloodbath. And see what happens. Hindus hate you because you are want a scrape goat to shit on as if just by taking a "stand" you've somehow proved yourselves to be morally superior; and that too you take stand by the keyboard. Tum khud kuch kiye ho kya? I am from UP, I know what all went into babri masjid demolition. It's not just the Ram Mandir issue. Muslims in my area, right after independence have stopped Ram lalla procession which used to happen since ages, centuries. They pelt stones cause riots when we have our festivals.
Unpopular News of the Last Month - r/india Edition
Here are some Policy/Politics/Economics/KashmiAyodhya Dispute related submissions which may have got missed out during the last month. We feel that this news deserves to be seen and heard by everyone and this thread collating such important news would be a recurring feature in india. Kashmir
Are the students of Jamia Millia Islamia really interested in secularism? Evidence points to the contrary.
Over the past week or so, we have seen violent protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) across many states. The one that was probably reported the most was the protest by Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) students. News channels like NDTV and India Today repeatedly reported how the police used excessive force against “peaceful” protesters. We were told that the students were opposed to the omission of Muslims from the CAA and sought to fight against it to “save” Indian democracy and “secularism”. While going through posts on social media, I came across an interesting piece of information - that JMI reserved 50% of its seats for Muslims. Not having too much faith in the accuracy of social media posts, I wanted to verify if this was really the case. Because if it were, it would clearly show that JMI was anything but secular. And so I started to go through their official websites: www.jmi.ac.in and www.jmicoe.in. What I learnt during my research astounded me. I knew that Muslim institutions gave preferential treatment to Muslims over non-Muslims but I never expected it to be this bad. My article relies solely on the documents and information available on these two official websites. No third parties, no hearsay. All the sources and links are listed at the end of this article. To begin with, the claim that 50% seats in JMI are reserved for Muslims is absolutely true. The following text has been taken from Page 30 of the 2018-19 prospectus of JMI. (as can be seen in the attached image) 5.1 (i) 30% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for Muslim applicants. (ii) 10% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for Women applicants who are Muslims. (iii) 10% of the total number of seats in each Program shall be earmarked for “Other Backward Classes” (OBCs) and Scheduled Tribes who are Muslims. Note: If seats remain vacant in any program from amongst the 10% of the total number of seats earmarked as per 5.1 (ii) and (iii) above, such vacant seats shall stand transferred to the category 5.1(i),i.e., Muslim applicants. In other words, 30% seats for Muslim applicants + 10% for Muslim women + 10% for Muslim OBC. If there are any vacant seats from the Muslim women or Muslim OBC category, then those seats would be transferred to other Muslim applicants. So there would AT LEAST 50% seats for Muslims in JMI. Why do I say at least 50%? Well, apart from the 50% reservation for Muslims, there’s 5% reservation for Persons with Disabilities (or PwD). This reservation for PwDs is not limited Muslims only but since the selection of students would be done by the JMI staff, they could opt for Muslims over PwDs from other religions. And on top of that, there’s 5% reservation for “Internal (Jamia) students” i.e. students of Jamia who have passed their qualifying examination (X or XII) from Jamia Schools. And given that the same 50% reservation policy for Muslims exists in Jamia schools, the students from this category could all be Muslims. So on the whole, there could be up to a maximum of 60% Muslims from the reserved categories. But wait, it gets a lot worse!! There could be far more than 60% Muslims in a program / course. How? Because Muslims can also get admissions in the General category !!! In other words, 50% seats are reserved for Muslims only i.e. only Muslims can opt for these seats. Of the 5% reserved seats for PwDs, Muslims can be given preference. And 5% reservation for internal jamia students would almost certainly be all Muslims. On top of that, there would be Muslim applicants in the General category i.e. Muslims students who opt for admissions not via reservation but in the general category. So in the end, the percentage of Muslim students could be way more than 60%. To find out the exact proportion of Muslim students, one would require the list of all admissions in a particular program / course. I did find the list of all admissions for the year 2019-20 but since those lists display only the registration number of the students and not their name and religion, it cannot be used to determine the exact number of Muslim students. However I did find the list of graduated students for the year 2018. This list mentions the name of the candidates in addition to the registration number. Here’s what I found: a. In B.Tech Computer Engineering, 37 of the 62 graduates are Muslims i.e. 59%. b. In B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering, 40 of the 62 graduates are Muslims i.e. 64%. c. In B.Tech Mechanical Engineering, 43 of the 65 graduates are Muslims i.e. 66%. d. In B.Tech Civil Engineering, 51 of the 65 graduates are Muslims i.e. 78%. Assuming that the proportion of students in admission and graduation would be more-or-less the same, this data not only confirmed my suspicions that the percentage of Muslim students in various courses would be least 60% but went on to show that it may be as high as 80%. I analysed the data for these four streams of engineering. There are several other courses but I did not spend my time analysing each and every single one. For those who are interested to dig deeper, relevant links can be found at the end of this article. I then looked into scholarships i.e. what percentage of the total number of students who received scholarships were Muslims. Alumni Association of Jamia Millia Islamia (AAJMI) is tasked with providing scholarships for JMI students. I found the list of the selected candidates for the current year. In the first list, out of the 325 selected candidates, 303 are Muslims; which is 93% !! And in the second list, 96 out of the 99 candidates are Muslims i.e. 97%. In other words, of all the students who received scholarship in 2019, approximately 95% were Muslims. This data conclusively proves that an overwhelming majority of students at JMI are Muslims and that Muslims are given preferential treatment. I wondered if the same pattern holds true for the positions of deans and Heads of Department (HODs). And predictably enough, JMI does not disappoint !! Of the 37 heads of various departments, 32 are Muslim i.e. 86%. And when it comes to the Deans of faculties, 8 of the 9 are Muslim = 89% !! (Annual Report 2017-18) Finally, I went through the list of Chancellors and Vice-Chancellors of JMI. By now, I’m sure you can guess what I would have found. Of the 11 Chancellors since 1920, not one is a non-Muslim. And the same holds true for VCs. Not one of the 15 Vice Chancellors since 1920 is a non-Muslim. So in the end, 60-80% of the students, 95% of scholarship recipients, 86% of the HODs, approximately 90% of the Deans of faculties, and all the past & present Chancellors & Vice Chancellors of JMI are Muslims !! And yet, they claim to fight for "secularism" !!! Ask yourself these simple questions: 1. How serious can the students of such a university be about “secularism”? 2. Should we as a nation pay any heed to their demands given their shameless hypocrisy? 3. If they indeed were such strong believers in the idea of secularism then wouldn’t they start by secularising their own university first? 4. Do the students and professors of this university have a moral right to oppose ANY act on the grounds of secularism? For any unbiased reader, this article conclusively proves that the JMI is not interested in secularism in the least. Then why are they protesting CAA? In my opinion, the reasons are: 1. Supreme Court’s decision in favour of Ram Mandir at Ayodhya. 2. Belief that Muslims must be loyal to fellow Muslims over the country i.e. Muslim Ummah (or Ummat). 3. Rightly / wrongly concluding that NRC will be bad. It is also very interesting how leftists / liberals and Muslims have learnt the subtle art of appropriating the Constitution to suit their own agenda. Everybody has heard the accusation that the CAA violates Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. One can find many Muslims, and non-Muslims, repeating the same crap. It is however very interesting that Muslims are demanding equality and cite Article 14 as the justification. Well, if they are so bent upon equality, then why don’t they accept the demand for Universal Civil Code (UCC)? NO!! You see, when the debate is about UCC, they quote Article 25 of the Constitution which gives the right to practice one’s own religion and claim various special privileges as a religious right; for eg. four wives, triple talaq, etc. And when the discussion pertains to giving citizenship to non-Muslim minorities from neighbouring Islamic countries, they jump to Article 14 !! In other words, they pick and choose that which suits them. So the next time you meet a leftist/liberal or Muslim who says that they oppose CAA because it goes against Article 14 and the principle of equal treatment, ask him if he supports Universal Civil Code. If he denies or gives you a lengthy nonsensical answer as to why he opposes UCC, then he stands exposed ; proving that he / she is not really interested in secularism. It is amazing that channels like NDTV who claim to present facts as they are have never seen fit to inform Indians about the vastly disproportionate number of Muslim students in JMI. Nor do they call out the hypocrisy of JMI “students”. If they would have, the whole country would have learnt that these protests have nothing to do with “secularism”. Now it is up to us to spread the word. Please share / forward this article so that the truth about JMI is known to everyone. (Original post by Rahul Arya, Right to Recall Party) Links: 1. JMI Prospectus for the year 2018-19 (see page 30): https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/admission/prospectus2018.pdf 2. JMI Prospectus for the year 2019-20 (see page 29): http://jmicoe.in/pdf18/Prospectus\_2019-20-new.pdf 3. JMI schools prospectus for 2019-20 (see page 9): http://jmicoe.in.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf19/Final%20Prospectus%20JSSS-2019-20%20\_1\_.pdf 4. Annual convocation 2018: https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/EventDetail/annualconvocation2019\_fet\_list\_2018.pdf 5. AAJMI scholarship: https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/advertisement/notice\_aajmi\_scholarship\_int\_2019february12.pdfhttps://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/advertisement/scholarship\_aajmi\_fl2\_2019april17.pdf 6. JMI Annual Report 2017-18 (pages 13-15): https://www.jmi.ac.in/upload/menuupload/university\_annual\_report\_english\_2017\_2018.pdf 7. List of Chancellors: https://www.jmi.ac.in/aboutjamia/profile/history/past\_chancellors\_profile-15 8. Lisf of Vice Chancellors: https://www.jmi.ac.in/aboutjamia/profile/history/past\_vice\_chancellors\_profile-16
•Mandir Wahi Bnayenge, Part 1: Ayodhya [✓] •Mandir Wahi Bnayenge, Part 2 : Kashi [ ] •Mandir Wahi Bnayenge, Part 3 : Mathura Part [ ] •Hindu Charter [ ] I believe we should start working on the remaining Parts of Mandir Wahi Bnayenge but what we should really strive for is Hindu Charter. I think Hindu Charter is really a game changer in Indian politics and in Hindu/Sanatan Dharma/Vedanta Society. Covering only the essential points.
It will give us, Hindus, to run and maintain own own Educational institutions. Where we can literally transform the society with the medium of education. Caste discrimination would be a thing of past. We can reclaim the narrative of Bharat history. Right the wrongs/lefts.
We can manage our own temples without govt interfering with in it's working. We can use the money collected in welfare of the community and Educational institution.
ANTI-CONVERSION Bill is okay, it is not a ultimate solution but it is a first aid kits. With the point mentioned above we can literally put an end to conversion...
When I'm talking about conversion, I can't help but remember Swami Shradhanand ji and his adventures at Jama Masjid. xD I would advice you all to watch his documentary on YouTube.
Teen tigada kaam bigada.
Or Kya chahiye nibba/nibbi? Pehle itna karte h.
With this, Let's keep the "Mandir Wahi Banega" alive and keep working towards Akhand Bharat, very enticing fantasy. Ram Ram Bakchods Jai Shree Ram 🙏
The Ayodhya Ram Mandir issue, which dates back over a generation, is one of India’s most highly contentious court cases and goes to the centre of its identity politics. Ayodhya Ram Mandir is in city named ayodhya is also known as awadh, a city in the state of Uttar Pradesh. It exists just east of Faizabad, on the Ghaghara River. Ayodhya Verdict: Entire Disputed Site Goes to Hindus for Ram Mandir, Muslims to Get 5 Acres of Alternate Land; Ram temple’s construction at Ayodhya may begin on Ram Navami . This is a Good Date For Starting Ram Mandir Construction . Do any Muslims support Ram Mandir in Ayodhya? There Are so Many Muslims Who Openly Supported Ram Mandir Construction in Ayodhya . There Are Also Many Muslims groups and Organization which demand construction Of Ram mandir On Disputed Land . We Can See So Many History about Ayodhya Ram Mandir. The present city Ayodhya has legends and has historical importance. As per scholars and historians, today’s Ayodhya dates back to the 4th or 5th century and this is considered as the golden era of India as per the records. Gupta Dynasty ruled during this period in India. Lord Sri Rama made Ayodhya as the Capital and ruled the Kingdom. From the history, it is known that Babar destroyed Ram Mandir and built the Mosque. Hindus regained access to Ayodhya during the reign of Akbar and Jahangir. Aurangzeb after getting into power demolished the temple and built the huge mosque. 22 kilogram silver brick to begin the construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya on the site of the Babri masjid mosque demolished on December 6, 1992.. Please Note: If you like the History and information of Ayodhya, please like our Facebook page or have a comment (History and information of Ayodhya) in the Comment Box below. HISTORY. Here I will be sharing Ram Mandir Ayodhya Tour and History, The Ayodhya question is a political, verifiable, and socio-strict discussion in India, fixated on a plot of land in the city of Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The issues spin around the control of a site generally respected among Hindus to be the origination of their god Rama, the history and area of the Babri Masjid at the site, and whether a past Hindu sanctuary was wrecked or altered to make a mosque. Chronologically, the history of Ayodhya as explained by these works begins with the birth of Ram 9,00,000 years back, followed by years of Greek and Kushana rule ending in the liberation of Ramjanmabhoomi.
History of Ayodhya Dynasty Ayodhya Ram Mandir History ...
Ram Mandir VS Babri Masjid Mysterious Proof of Ram Temple in Ayodhya राम मंदिर के रहस्यमयी सबूत Ram Janmabhoomi (literally, "Rama's birthplace") is the ... All you need to do is hit the "SUBSCRIBE" button and stay tuned to our Non-stop Fun/Entertainment video channel Please Like, Share and Comment in Comment Box... Hey Friends, in this video you will see the history of Ayodhya dispute and explaining the timeline of key events happened from 1528 -2020. Following the historical verdict on Ayodhya dispute, 05 ... Ram Mandir (transl. Ram Temple) is a Hindu temple that is being built at the sacred pilgrimage site of Ram Janmabhoomi in Ayodhya of Uttar Pradesh, India.[3]... #History_Video #Ayodhya_History #RealStoryAyodhya city is identified with the legendary city of Ayodhya, and as such, is the birthplace of Rama and setting o... ayodhya is the birth place of bhagwan ram, in this part we will explain the history of ram mandir ayodhya, where is ram birth place in india, history of ram ... Ram Mandir has always been a controversial topic in the country! In this video we will tell everything about the Ram Mandir from 1528 to now! Watch this vide... For every Hindu #RamMandir is issue of pride. #RamMandirHistory tells us that #Ram_Mandir was demolished by babar.....#ItihasMarg #RamMandirAyodh...
